Journal cover Journal topic
Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences An open-access publication for refereed proceedings in hydrology

Journal metrics

  • SNIP value: 0.058 SNIP 0.058
  • SJR value: 0.135 SJR 0.135
  • IPP value: 0.096 IPP 0.096
Proc. IAHS, 373, 153-159, 2016
http://www.proc-iahs.net/373/153/2016/
doi:10.5194/piahs-373-153-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
 
12 May 2016
Visualising DEM-related flood-map uncertainties using a disparity-distance equation algorithm
S. Anders Brandt1,* and Nancy J. Lim1,* 1Department of Industrial Development, IT and Land Management, University of Gävle, 80176 Gävle, Sweden
*These authors contributed equally to this work.
Abstract. The apparent absoluteness of information presented by crisp-delineated flood boundaries can lead to misconceptions among planners about the inherent uncertainties associated in generated flood maps. Even maps based on hydraulic modelling using the highest-resolution digital elevation models (DEMs), and calibrated with the most optimal Manning's roughness (n) coefficients, are susceptible to errors when compared to actual flood boundaries, specifically in flat areas. Therefore, the inaccuracies in inundation extents, brought about by the characteristics of the slope perpendicular to the flow direction of the river, have to be accounted for. Instead of using the typical Monte Carlo simulation and probabilistic methods for uncertainty quantification, an empirical-based disparity-distance equation that considers the effects of both the DEM resolution and slope was used to create prediction-uncertainty zones around the resulting inundation extents of a one-dimensional (1-D) hydraulic model. The equation was originally derived for the Eskilstuna River where flood maps, based on DEM data of different resolutions, were evaluated for the slope-disparity relationship. To assess whether the equation is applicable to another river with different characteristics, modelled inundation extents from the Testebo River were utilised and tested with the equation. By using the cross-sectional locations, water surface elevations, and DEM, uncertainty zones around the original inundation boundary line can be produced for different confidences. The results show that (1) the proposed method is useful both for estimating and directly visualising model inaccuracies caused by the combined effects of slope and DEM resolution, and (2) the DEM-related uncertainties alone do not account for the total inaccuracy of the derived flood map. Decision-makers can apply it to already existing flood maps, thereby recapitulating and re-analysing the inundation boundaries and the areas that are uncertain. Hence, more comprehensive flood information can be provided when determining locations where extra precautions are needed. Yet, when applied, users must also be aware that there are other factors that can influence the extent of the delineated flood boundary.

Citation: Brandt, S. A. and Lim, N. J.: Visualising DEM-related flood-map uncertainties using a disparity-distance equation algorithm, Proc. IAHS, 373, 153-159, doi:10.5194/piahs-373-153-2016, 2016.
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
The apparent absoluteness of flood boundaries on risk maps can lead to serious mistakes, for example when planning new areas. An empirical equation, that considers both digital elevation model (DEM) resolution and terrain slope, was used to create prediction-uncertainty zones around already modelled flood extents. Results show that the method can visualise inaccuracies due to DEM and slope conditions, thereby enhancing the quality of later decision-making processes.
The apparent absoluteness of flood boundaries on risk maps can lead to serious mistakes, for...
Share