Journal cover Journal topic
Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences An open-access publication for refereed proceedings in hydrology

Journal metrics

  • SNIP value: 0.058 SNIP 0.058
  • SJR value: 0.135 SJR 0.135
  • IPP value: 0.096 IPP 0.096
Proc. IAHS, 373, 201-208, 2016
http://www.proc-iahs.net/373/201/2016/
doi:10.5194/piahs-373-201-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
 
12 May 2016
Small-scale (flash) flood early warning in the light of operational requirements: opportunities and limits with regard to user demands, driving data, and hydrologic modeling techniques
Andy Philipp1, Florian Kerl1, Uwe Büttner1, Christine Metzkes1,2, Thomas Singer2, Michael Wagner2, and Niels Schütze2 1Saxon State Office for Environment, Agriculture and Geology, Water, Soil, and Waste, 01109 Dresden, Germany
2Institute of Hydrology and Meteorology, Dresden University of Technology, 01069 Dresden, Germany
Abstract. In recent years, the Free State of Saxony (Eastern Germany) was repeatedly hit by both extensive riverine flooding, as well as flash flood events, emerging foremost from convective heavy rainfall. Especially after a couple of small-scale, yet disastrous events in 2010, preconditions, drivers, and methods for deriving flash flood related early warning products are investigated. This is to clarify the feasibility and the limits of envisaged early warning procedures for small catchments, hit by flashy heavy rain events. Early warning about potentially flash flood prone situations (i.e., with a suitable lead time with regard to required reaction-time needs of the stakeholders involved in flood risk management) needs to take into account not only hydrological, but also meteorological, as well as communication issues. Therefore, we propose a threefold methodology to identify potential benefits and limitations in a real-world warning/reaction context. First, the user demands (with respect to desired/required warning products, preparation times, etc.) are investigated. Second, focusing on small catchments of some hundred square kilometers, two quantitative precipitation forecasts are verified. Third, considering the user needs, as well as the input parameter uncertainty (i.e., foremost emerging from an uncertain QPF), a feasible, yet robust hydrological modeling approach is proposed on the basis of pilot studies, employing deterministic, data-driven, and simple scoring methods.

Citation: Philipp, A., Kerl, F., Büttner, U., Metzkes, C., Singer, T., Wagner, M., and Schütze, N.: Small-scale (flash) flood early warning in the light of operational requirements: opportunities and limits with regard to user demands, driving data, and hydrologic modeling techniques, Proc. IAHS, 373, 201-208, doi:10.5194/piahs-373-201-2016, 2016.
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
The paper identifies the opportunities and limits of flood early warning in small catchments. Flood early warning for small, fast-responding catchments usually need to include rainfall forecasts. First, the demands of potential users of warning products are assessed. Second, the quality and limitations of rainfall forecasts (emerging from meteorological forecasting uncertainty) are investigated. Third, different flood forecasting techniques are compared.
The paper identifies the opportunities and limits of flood early warning in small catchments....
Share