Journal cover Journal topic
Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences An open-access publication for refereed proceedings in hydrology

Journal metrics

  • SNIP value: 0.058 SNIP 0.058
  • SJR value: 0.135 SJR 0.135
  • IPP value: 0.096 IPP 0.096
Proc. IAHS, 373, 61-67, 2016
http://www.proc-iahs.net/373/61/2016/
doi:10.5194/piahs-373-61-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
 
12 May 2016
A regional look at the selection of a process-oriented model for flood peak/volume relationships
Ján Szolgay1, Ladislav Gaál1,2, Tomáš Bacigál3, Silvia Kohnová1, Kamila Hlavčová1, Roman Výleta1, and Günter Blöschl4 1Department of Land and Water Resources Management, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Slovak University of Technology, Bratislava, Slovakia
2MicroStep-MIS, spol. s r.o., Bratislava, Slovakia
3Department of Mathematics and Descriptive Geometry, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Slovak University of Technology, Bratislava, Slovakia
4Institute for Hydraulic and Water Resources Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria
Abstract. Recent research on the bivariate flood peak/volume frequency analysis has mainly focused on the statistical aspects of the use of various copula models. The interplay of climatic and catchment processes in discriminating among these models has attracted less interest. In the paper we analyse the influence of climatic and hydrological controls on flood peak and volume relationships and their models, which are based on the concept of comparative hydrology in the catchments of a selected region in Austria. Independent flood events have been isolated and assigned to one of the three types of flood processes: synoptic floods, flash floods and snowmelt floods. First, empirical copulas are regionally compared in order to verify whether any flood processes are discernible in terms of the corresponding bivariate flood-peak relationships. Next the types of copulas, which are frequently used in hydrology are fitted, and their goodness-of-fit is examined in a regional scope. The spatial similarity of copulas and their rejection rate, depending on the flood type, region, and sample size are examined, too. In particular, the most remarkable difference is observed between flash floods and the other two types of flood. It is concluded that treating flood processes separately in such an analysis is beneficial, both hydrologically and statistically, since flood processes and the relationships associated with them are discernible both locally and regionally in the pilot region.

However, uncertainties inherent in the copula-based bivariate frequency analysis itself (caused, among others, also by the relatively small sample sizes for consistent copula model selection, upper tail dependence characterization and reliable predictions) may not be overcome in the scope of such a regional comparative analysis.


Citation: Szolgay, J., Gaál, L., Bacigál, T., Kohnová, S., Hlavčová, K., Výleta, R., and Blöschl, G.: A regional look at the selection of a process-oriented model for flood peak/volume relationships, Proc. IAHS, 373, 61-67, doi:10.5194/piahs-373-61-2016, 2016.
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
The design of hydraulic structures where storage is involved, requires estimates of joint probability distribution of flood volumes and flood peaks. The problem of choosing a joint distribution was so far approached more from a statistical point of view. In the paper the suitability of various copula models of this relationships was analysed with a particular focus on the type and seasonality of flood generation processes in a regional context.
The design of hydraulic structures where storage is involved, requires estimates of joint...
Share