Journal cover Journal topic
Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences An open-access publication for refereed proceedings in hydrology

Journal metrics

  • SNIP value: 0.058 SNIP 0.058
  • SJR value: 0.135 SJR 0.135
  • IPP value: 0.096 IPP 0.096
Proc. IAHS, 374, 159-163, 2016
http://www.proc-iahs.net/374/159/2016/
doi:10.5194/piahs-374-159-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
 
17 Oct 2016
Comparison of cross-validation and bootstrap aggregating for building a seasonal streamflow forecast model
Simon Schick1,2, Ole Rössler1,2, and Rolf Weingartner1,2 1Institute of Geography, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
2Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research, Bern, Switzerland
Abstract. Based on a hindcast experiment for the period 1982–2013 in 66 sub-catchments of the Swiss Rhine, the present study compares two approaches of building a regression model for seasonal streamflow forecasting. The first approach selects a single "best guess" model, which is tested by leave-one-out cross-validation. The second approach implements the idea of bootstrap aggregating, where bootstrap replicates are employed to select several models, and out-of-bag predictions provide model testing. The target value is mean streamflow for durations of 30, 60 and 90 days, starting with the 1st and 16th day of every month. Compared to the best guess model, bootstrap aggregating reduces the mean squared error of the streamflow forecast by seven percent on average. Thus, if resampling is anyway part of the model building procedure, bootstrap aggregating seems to be a useful strategy in statistical seasonal streamflow forecasting. Since the improved accuracy comes at the cost of a less interpretable model, the approach might be best suited for pure prediction tasks, e.g. as in operational applications.

Citation: Schick, S., Rössler, O., and Weingartner, R.: Comparison of cross-validation and bootstrap aggregating for building a seasonal streamflow forecast model, Proc. IAHS, 374, 159-163, doi:10.5194/piahs-374-159-2016, 2016.
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
In water resources management, planning at the seasonal time scale is confronted with large uncertainties. Key variables are often unknown or hard to forecast, e.g. precipitation of the next three months. In the present study, we try to highlight some aspects concerning the development of a model faced with these uncertainties. Using the example of statistical streamflow forecasts, the results of the study indicate that the forecast accuracy is improved by the combination of several models.
In water resources management, planning at the seasonal time scale is confronted with large...
Share