Journal cover Journal topic
Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences An open-access publication for refereed proceedings in hydrology

Journal metrics

  • SNIP value: 0.058 SNIP 0.058
  • SJR value: 0.135 SJR 0.135
  • IPP value: 0.096 IPP 0.096
Proc. IAHS, 373, 19-24, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-373-19-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
 
12 May 2016
Scaling issues in multi-criteria evaluation of combinations of measures for integrated river basin management
Jörg Dietrich Institute of Water Resources Management, Hydrology and Agricultural Hydraulic Engineering, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, 30167, Germany
Abstract. In integrated river basin management, measures for reaching the environmental objectives can be evaluated at different scales, and according to multiple criteria of different nature (e.g. ecological, economic, social). Decision makers, including responsible authorities and stakeholders, follow different interests regarding criteria and scales. With a bottom up approach, the multi criteria assessment could produce a different outcome than with a top down approach. The first assigns more power to the local community, which is a common principle of IWRM. On the other hand, the development of an overall catchment strategy could potentially make use of synergetic effects of the measures, which fulfils the cost efficiency requirement at the basin scale but compromises local interests. Within a joint research project for the 5500 km2 Werra river basin in central Germany, measures have been planned to reach environmental objectives of the European Water Framework directive (WFD) regarding ecological continuity and nutrient loads. The main criteria for the evaluation of the measures were costs of implementation, reduction of nutrients, ecological benefit and social acceptance. The multi-criteria evaluation of the catchment strategies showed compensation between positive and negative performance of criteria within the catchment, which in the end reduced the discriminative power of the different strategies. Furthermore, benefit criteria are partially computed for the whole basin only. Both ecological continuity and nutrient load show upstream-downstream effects in opposite direction. The principles of "polluter pays" and "overall cost efficiency" can be followed for the reduction of nutrient losses when financial compensations between upstream and downstream users are made, similar to concepts of emission trading.

Citation: Dietrich, J.: Scaling issues in multi-criteria evaluation of combinations of measures for integrated river basin management, Proc. IAHS, 373, 19-24, https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-373-19-2016, 2016.
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
This research article presents finding from an interdisciplinary joint research project in integrated river basin management. For the implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive, measures to improve the hydromorphological situation and to reduce nutrient emissions have been planned at water body scale. We used a strategy approach to formulate alternative solutions for the whole basin according to policy directions. The results should inform and support stakeholders and decision makers.
This research article presents finding from an interdisciplinary joint research project in...
Share