Journal cover Journal topic
Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences An open-access publication for refereed proceedings in hydrology

Journal metrics

  • SNIP value: 0.058 SNIP 0.058
  • SJR value: 0.135 SJR 0.135
  • IPP value: 0.096 IPP 0.096
Proc. IAHS, 374, 9-15, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-374-9-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
 
17 Oct 2016
Developing new scenarios for water allocation negotiations: a case study of the Euphrates River Basin
Mohammad Reza Jarkeh1, Ameneh Mianabadi2, and Hojjat Mianabadi3 1Department of Water engineering, University of Zabol, Zabol, 9861335586, Iran
2Department of Water engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, 9177948974, Iran
3Department of Water Resources, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1, 2628 CN, Delft, the Netherlands
Abstract. Mismanagement and uneven distribution of water may lead to or increase conflict among countries. Allocation of water among trans-boundary river neighbours is a key issue in utilization of shared water resources. The bankruptcy theory is a cooperative Game Theory method which is used when the amount of demand of riparian states is larger than total available water. In this study, we survey the application of seven methods of Classical Bankruptcy Rules (CBRs) including Proportional (CBR-PRO), Adjusted Proportional (CBR-AP), Constrained Equal Awards (CBR-CEA), Constrained Equal Losses (CBR-CEL), Piniles (CBR-Piniles), Minimal Overlap (CBR-MO), Talmud (CBR-Talmud) and four Sequential Sharing Rules (SSRs) including Proportional (SSR-PRO), Constrained Equal Awards (SSR-CEA), Constrained Equal Losses (SSR-CEL) and Talmud (SSR-Talmud) methods in allocation of the Euphrates River among three riparian countries: Turkey, Syria and Iraq. However, there is not a certain documented method to find more equitable allocation rule. Therefore, in this paper, a new method is established for choosing the most appropriate allocating rule which seems to be more equitable than other allocation rules to satisfy the stakeholders. The results reveal that, based on the new propose model, the CBR-AP seems to be more equitable to allocate the Euphrates River water among Turkey, Syria and Iraq.

Citation: Jarkeh, M. R., Mianabadi, A., and Mianabadi, H.: Developing new scenarios for water allocation negotiations: a case study of the Euphrates River Basin, Proc. IAHS, 374, 9-15, https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-374-9-2016, 2016.
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
In this paper we established a new method to choose the most appropriate allocating rule which seems to be more equitable and reasonable than other allocation rules to satisfy the riparian countries. To evaluate this new proposed method, we applied seven Classical Bankruptcy Rules (CBRs) and four Sequential Sharing Rules (SSRs) in allocating the Euphrates River water among three riparian countries: Turkey, Syria and Iraq.
In this paper we established a new method to choose the most appropriate allocating rule which...
Share