Articles | Volume 382
https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-382-761-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-382-761-2020
Pre-conference publication
 | 
22 Apr 2020
Pre-conference publication |  | 22 Apr 2020

Cost-benefit analysis of urban subsidence mitigation strategies in Gouda, the Netherlands

Sien Kok and Saskia Hommes-Slag

Viewed

Total article views: 1,096 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
751 313 32 1,096 37 35
  • HTML: 751
  • PDF: 313
  • XML: 32
  • Total: 1,096
  • BibTeX: 37
  • EndNote: 35
Views and downloads (calculated since 22 Apr 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 22 Apr 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 912 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 912 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 28 Mar 2024
Download
Short summary
Subsidence is expected to cause significant damage to infrastructure and building foundations in the Netherlands. As the processes are mostly human-induced, this damage may be prevented. Economic impact assessment can help identify the optimal approach to dealing with subsidence, but experience with this is still limited. We develop a cost-benefit analysis (CBA) of strategies developed in the historic center of Gouda, the Netherlands which was used by the Municipality to focus future efforts.